Malware Analysis Series

Deep technical malware analysis reports, reverse engineering tools, unpacked stages, and recreated TTPs with detections for infamous malware families.


Project maintained by shaddy43 Hosted on GitHub Pages — Theme by mattgraham

MedusaLocker Ransomware — Technical Analysis

MedusaLocker ransomware analysis

MedusaLocker is a human-operated ransomware family that has been hitting healthcare, education and enterprise targets since 2019. This variant is notable for how thoroughly it prepares the ground before encrypting: it escalates through a CMSTPLUA COM UAC bypass, disables UAC entirely, stops and deletes interfering services, kills processes holding file locks, and destroys recovery options through three separate mechanisms rather than the usual single vssadmin call. Only then does the AES-256/RSA encryptor run — and a networking module hunts SMB shares so the damage does not stop at the local host.

This post walks through the full reverse engineering of the MedusaLocker payload, technique by technique, with the disassembly screenshots taken during the analysis.

Scope: stages 1 and 2 — initial access via maldoc and execution through a batch script that invokes PowerShell — are not covered here. This analysis targets the stage 3 ransomware executable itself.

⚠️ Note: This is a re-write by AI, but have been vetted by Author.

📄 The original report is also available as a PDF. Samples (password infected), recreated TTP code and detection rules are in the GitHub repository.


Key findings

# Finding
1 CMSTPLUA COM UAC bypass — privileges are escalated through the well-known CMSTPLUA COM interface before any critical operation.
2 Defacement marker — a registry key at HKCU\SOFTWARE\MDSLK\Self is planted to mark the host as infected; an unusual and highly specific artefact.
3 Programmatic scheduled task — persistence avoids at.exe and schtasks.exe entirely, scheduling the task in C++ via the MSDN Task Scheduler API, repeating every 15 minutes indefinitely.
4 UAC disabled two ways — both EnableLUA and ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin are set to 0, so a failure of the first is covered by the second.
5 Services stopped and deleted — it does not merely stop interfering services, it removes them via the Service Control Manager.
6 Triple recovery destructionvssadmin and wbadmin for shadow copies, bcdedit to block recovery mode, plus emptying the recycle bin.
7 AES-256 + RSA — every file gets a random AES key, itself encrypted with an embedded base64 RSA public key and stored in the ransom note.
8 Mutex-gated single instance — a unique mutex stops multiple instances, which matters because the scheduled task re-launches it every 15 minutes.
9 SMB share discovery — ICMP sweeps the local network, then enumerates non-hidden SMB shares and queues them for encryption.

MITRE coverage at a glance

The MedusaLocker executable touches an unusually wide span of the ATT&CK matrix. The sandbox mapping from a public report gives a sense of the breadth before diving in:

MITRE ATT&CK mapping from a public sandbox report


Mutex

MedusaLocker opens with the most common ransomware housekeeping step: a unique mutex so only one instance runs at a time. This matters more than usual here — the scheduled task re-executes the binary every 15 minutes, and worm-like families risk re-infecting themselves.

Disassembly of the mutex creation routine

The disassembly (from a stripped binary) shows three functions:

  1. A print subroutine that would emit [Locker] Is runningdisabled in this build.
  2. A string-format function that builds the unique mutex name.
  3. The call that actually creates the mutex.

Privilege escalation: CMSTPLUA UAC bypass

Before any critical operation, MedusaLocker escalates locally by abusing COM objects to bypass UAC — specifically the well-documented CMSTPLUA COM interface bypass.

CMSTPLUA COM interface UAC bypass in the stripped binary

The CLSIDs reference the WScript shell exec object, used to run the attacker’s command with elevation. In the stripped binary the functions are meaningless; after renaming the functions and parameters, the intent becomes obvious:

The same routine after renaming functions and parameters

ATT&CK mapping


Defacement: the MDSLK marker

A genuinely unusual behaviour: MedusaLocker plants a marker registry key recording that the system has been infected.

MDSLK marker registry key

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\MDSLK\Self

MDSLK is almost certainly shorthand for Medusa Locker. The operational purpose is not clear — it may be a defacement gesture, or simply a flag the operators use to identify their own victims. Either way it is a high-fidelity host artefact, precisely because it is so specific and has no benign equivalent.

ATT&CK mapping


Persistence: a hand-rolled scheduled task

Most malware reaches for at.exe or schtasks.exe — both heavily monitored. MedusaLocker instead schedules its task programmatically in C++, using the official Microsoft Task Scheduler API straight from the MSDN sample code.

Scheduled task persistence routine

The sequence:

  1. Copy itself to %APPDATA% as svhost.exe — a deliberate near-miss for the legitimate svchost.exe.
  2. Register a scheduled task that re-executes it every 15 minutes, indefinitely.
  3. On each re-execution, the mutex check ensures that if an instance is already running, the new one exits and lets the original continue.

This is why the mutex exists at all — persistence and single-instancing are two halves of the same design.

ATT&CK mapping


Defense evasion: disabling UAC

Having escalated via CMSTPLUA, MedusaLocker can now make system-wide changes — and the first one is to switch UAC off entirely through the registry:

Registry modifications disabling UAC

Value Set to Effect
EnableLUA 0 The administrator prompt is never shown; everything runs elevated
ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin 0 Backup measure — suppresses the consent prompt, but only takes effect after a restart

The author deliberately set both: if the first fails, the second guarantees UAC is disabled once the machine reboots.

ATT&CK mapping


Service stop and process termination

To ensure nothing holds a file lock or interrupts encryption, MedusaLocker enumerates a predefined set of services and processes and shuts them down. The list is recoverable through simple static string analysis:

Targeted services and processes extracted from the binary

Two mechanisms are used:

ATT&CK mapping


Inhibit system recovery

Where most ransomware settles for deleting shadow copies, MedusaLocker attacks recovery from multiple angles:

Recovery destruction commands

Every one of these is launched through CreateProcessW, which treats the first whitespace as the boundary between process name and arguments. The subroutine sub_41E9A0 is the one spawning them:

The CreateProcessW subroutine spawning recovery-deletion commands

ATT&CK mapping


Encryption

MedusaLocker uses symmetric encryption for speed, wrapped in asymmetric encryption for control — the standard hybrid ransomware design:

Embedded base64 RSA public key and skip lists

The scheme:

  1. A base64-encoded RSA public key is embedded in the binary (recoverable with FLOSS).
  2. It is converted to binary form with CryptStringToBinaryA for use by the crypto APIs.
  3. A random AES-256 key is generated per file using CryptGenKey.
  4. That symmetric key is encrypted with the embedded RSA public key and written into the HTML ransom note — so only the attacker’s private key can recover it.
  5. The encryptor then runs, honouring a list of folders and extensions to skip (visible in the extracted strings just below the public key) so the host stays bootable and payable.

ATT&CK mapping


Discovery and lateral movement

MedusaLocker carries a networking module that extends the blast radius beyond the local machine:

SMB share discovery module

  1. Send an ICMP ping to each system in the local network, sequentially.
  2. For every host that responds, enumerate SMB shares.
  3. Exclude hidden shares (those containing $ in the name).
  4. Accumulate the remaining shares into a list — queued for encryption later.

ATT&CK mapping


Recreated TTPs and detections

Every technique below has been recreated as buildable C++ and paired with a detection rule or query. Links point to the write-up first, then the detection notes, then the raw source.

Technique ID Write-up · Detection · Code
Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task T1053.005 Write-up · Detection · Code
Impair Defenses: Disable UAC T1562.001 Write-up · Detection · Code
Impair Defenses: Disable UAC Prompt T1562.001 Write-up · Detection · Code
Data Encrypted for Impact T1486 Write-up · Detection · Code
Impair Defenses: Terminate Processes T1562.001 Write-up · Detection · Code
Service Stop T1489 Write-up · Detection · Code
Inhibit System Recovery T1490 Write-up · Detection · Code
Network Share Discovery T1135 Write-up · Detection · Code
Abuse Elevation Control: Bypass UAC (CMSTPLUA) T1548.002 Code coming soon
Defacement: Internal Defacement T1491.001 Covered in this write-up

See the full project matrix on the ATT&CK coverage page.


Detection opportunities

Per-technique detection rules and queries — with Sysmon, Defender and audit log screenshots — are published alongside each recreated TTP in the table above.


Indicators of compromise

Hash (SHA-256)

26af2222204fca27c0fdabf9eefbfdb638a8a9322b297119f85cce3c708090f0

Host artefacts

HKCU\SOFTWARE\MDSLK\Self                    infection marker (defacement)
%APPDATA%\svhost.exe                        persistence copy
Scheduled task repeating every 15 minutes   persistence, created via COM API
HKLM\...\Policies\System\EnableLUA = 0      UAC disabled
HKLM\...\Policies\System\ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin = 0
HTML ransom note                            contains the RSA-encrypted AES key

⚠️ The sample in this repository is live ransomware, stored in an archive with the password infected. Detonate only inside an isolated, network-controlled VM with no access to production data or network shares — this family actively looks for SMB shares. See SECURITY.md.


Disclaimer

The artifacts, code and analysis in this repository are provided strictly for educational and research purposes. I do not condone or support any malicious use of this material.

← Back to all analyses